Skip to content

Nationwide

Asian food distributors in the US

On almost every page of this site, the company selling you a case bought it from somebody who imported it. On this one, most of the time, it did not. A public federal list makes that checkable company by company, and it is the clearest structural difference between this trade and the rest of food distribution.

  • Every supplier here was verified against the company's own website when its metro page was built, and each row links to that full listing.
  • The importer line on each row comes from FDA's own published list for the April to June 2026 quarter. Being on it conveys no approval, and FDA says so.
  • This page is about supplying kitchens. The retail half of the trade, importers stocking supermarkets, is a different business and is not covered here.

At a glance

Suppliers verified
56
Across 7 researched metros
Ship beyond their metro
7
Say so on their own site
Independent houses
43
Local specialists and regional distributors
Deliver to you
48
Within the areas they publish
Walk-in options
11
Collect without a delivery minimum
Publish a delivery area
31
The rest say nothing about how far they go

Every Asian food supplier we have verified, in one list

Filter by metro, by how the business is set up, and by how you can buy. Each row says whether the company appears on FDA's public list of food importers for the April to June 2026 quarter, which is the closest thing to a published answer to who brings the container in. Being on that list conveys no approval and names no product; it means that company imported some food in that quarter.

City

Supplier type

How you buy

Showing 56 of 56 suppliers.

The importing leg sits inside the distributor here, and almost nowhere else

FDA puts the duty in one sentence: "importers of food products intended for introduction into U.S. interstate commerce are responsible for ensuring that the products are safe, sanitary, and labeled according to U.S. requirements", and it adds that all imported food counts as interstate commerce.

On most pages of this site that duty belongs to somebody the reader never deals with. Here it usually belongs to the company on the invoice, and there is a public federal list that shows it. Under section 805(g) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, FDA publishes the names and states of importers subject to the Foreign Supplier Verification Programs rule, updated quarterly. The file for April to June 2026 holds 28,897 importers.

Matched against this directory by legal name and state, 33 of the 56 suppliers on this page appear on it. Across all 789 listings on the site the rate is 18.8 percent, and on the coffee pages it is 6.7 percent, which is the comparison worth pausing on: the United States grows essentially no coffee, and yet a roaster is almost never the importer, because it buys green beans from one. In this trade the importing leg is usually not outsourced at all.

Three caveats travel with that, and two of them are FDA's own. Inclusion on the list conveys no approval or endorsement of any kind. An importer on it may not be the importer of record for customs purposes. And the list names no commodity, so a match means the company imported some food that quarter and nothing more specific than that.

The fourth caveat is ours, and it makes the number a floor rather than a figure. The match is per state, and a corporate group files under one legal entity in one state, so two companies here that plainly import do not match in their own state and do match in another. Read 33 as the smallest defensible count.

What it is useful for is narrow and real: a company that imports for itself can usually answer a question about where a product came from without calling anybody, and a company that buys from an importer sometimes cannot. That is a question about position in the chain, not about candor.

MetroVerifiedDeliverShip outWalk inPublish a year
Los AngelesCA1917327
ChicagoIL16131511
New YorkNY14112211
AtlantaGA22001
BaltimoreMD22100
DallasTX22011
TampaFL11011

Counts of the asian food suppliers we have verified in each metro, from what each company publishes about itself. They are not a count of the companies trading there, and a metro with more rows has been researched longer rather than being better supplied.

The case in your walk-in is marked with its country of origin, by law

This is the most checkable thing on the page and it takes about thirty seconds in any kitchen. Customs and Border Protection states the rule plainly: "Every article of foreign origin entering the United States must be legibly marked with the English name of the country of origin unless an exception from marking is provided for in the law."

The second half of the rule is the part worth knowing. CBP defines the ultimate purchaser as "generally the last person in the United States who will receive the article in the form in which it was imported". If you are buying a case of soy sauce, rice vinegar or dried noodles and reselling it as a dish rather than as that article, the marking on the case exists to inform you. Go and read one.

Behind that marking is a routine that explains a good deal about lead times. Every imported food shipment requires prior notice to FDA before it arrives, which is compliance work a distributor does on every container and which a domestic supplier never does. When an Asian food distributor quotes a longer lead time on an imported line than on a domestic one, that is usually what is being priced in rather than reluctance.

None of this is a labeling obligation on a restaurant. It is a marking obligation on goods, and it is why an origin question on this trade has a documentary answer rather than an opinion.

One federal register names these companies. Another is sealed.

It is worth being precise about which federal lists exist, because two of the three are routinely confused and one of them is the reason this directory has to be built by hand.

The importer list above is public and quarterly. Food facility registration is not: FDA's own guidance says in terms that "FFR information is not public", while noting that a facility may need to give its registration number to whoever files prior notice on an imported shipment. And the FDA establishment identification number is a third thing again, a public identifier with its own search portal.

So a buyer can find out who imported food last quarter and cannot find out who holds a warehouse registration, which is roughly the opposite of what most people assume. It is also the same shape as the closed register behind our national grocery page, where the sealed list is the whole reason a directory has to exist.

One thing this page will not do with the federal data is put a named enforcement action beside a listed company. Import alerts exist, FDA describes them as protecting consumers against products with a history of known violations, and they rest on what FDA calls an appearance standard, meaning a product appears to violate rather than having been found to. The alert pages are dynamic and could not be checked company by company here. That cuts both ways: this page asserts neither that any supplier is on one nor that none is.

  • The FSVP importer list. Public, quarterly, names and states only. It says a company imported food in a quarter. It conveys no approval and names no product.
  • Food facility registration. Mandatory for anyone holding food for US consumption, renewed every other year, and not disclosable. There is no public version of it.
  • The FDA establishment identifier. A separate public number with its own search portal, which is what to reach for when a registration number is not available.
  • Import alerts. A published mechanism rather than a verdict, resting on an appearance standard. Useful to understand, not useful to attach to a company without checking.

Four companies call themselves the leading Asian food distributor in the US

This page adjudicates nothing between them, and the reason it cannot is the most useful thing it has to say about the trade.

One says it is the "No.1 Asian Food Importer" and "the #1 Asian food distributor in the U.S.". Another says "we are the U.S. market leader" and that it has become "the leading Asian food distributor in the U.S.". A third's home page reads "The leading Asian food distributor in the US". The fourth, the only one that files audited accounts, describes itself in its SEC filing as "a leading Asian food distributor in the U.S." Note the article.

Only that fourth company publishes a number. Its 2024 annual report gives net revenue of $1,201.7 million against $1,148.5 million the year before, gross profit of $205.2 million and a net loss of $48.1 million. That is the only published revenue figure anywhere in this category, and it comes with a loss attached, which is worth saying plainly rather than quoting the growth line alone.

The same filing describes the market it operates in, and the description matches what this directory finds from the other direction: "The Asian foodservice market is currently highly fragmented with many small and unsophisticated direct store distributors, such as small-scale wholesaler redistributors, specialty import brokers, farmers markets, and local produce retailers, operating without significant financial support or a sophisticated logistics infrastructure." Those are a public company's words about its own market, filed with a regulator, and they are quoted here as that rather than adopted as ours.

Everything else a search returns about the size of this market is a paywalled market-research estimate. Four leadership claims, one audited number, and no independent measure at all is a fair summary of what is publicly knowable, and it is why this page counts what companies publish rather than ranking them.

The national tier is thicker here, and thirteen city pages understate it

Twenty percent of the rows on the three Asian food city pages are national broadlines, against roughly eight percent across this whole directory, and those rows belong to just five companies. Two names on one page can be one company more often here than anywhere else on the site.

One of them makes the point on its own. Kikkoman's corporate site records that it "entered the Asian food wholesale business, specializing Japanese food, by acquiring a management stake in Japan Foods Corp. (now JFC International, Inc.) of the U.S. in 1969", and that the group now has bases in 24 countries and regions. Its published US branch list runs to twenty cities, ten of which are cities this directory covers. It is a row on two of our pages.

That gap is a fact about our method rather than about the company, and it is worth admitting on the page that benefits from admitting it. A city page acquires a national supplier's branch only when a researcher happened to open its locations page during that city's research. Thirteen city pages built one at a time will therefore systematically under-count the national tier, and only a page holding all of them at once can see that happening.

The largest broadline in the country also runs a division under this name, and its own description of the category is the best support anywhere for how wide the term has become: "From our early years serving primarily Chinese restaurants, we have expanded our customer focus to include Thai, Vietnamese, Korean, Japanese, Indian, Middle Eastern, Mediterranean, and African customers." That is a third party saying the label now reaches past Asia, which is a better source for a scope question than our own reasoning would be.

For a buyer the consequence is the ordinary one this site keeps arriving at from different directions. Keeping a second supplier only buys leverage if the second one answers to somebody else, and on this page the odds of two names sharing a parent are higher than usual.

What the 56 rows here publish, across 7 metros

Everything above is federal or filed. This part is our own dataset, counted when the page loaded.

48 of the 56 say they deliver, 11 run a counter you can walk into, and 7 say they will ship beyond their own metro. The walk-in tier matters more in this category than in most: three of the companies that do not appear on the importer list are cash-and-carry markets, which is exactly what you would expect, because a market that opens its doors to the public buys from importers rather than importing.

33 of the 56 publish an email address and 23 do not. 54 publish a street address, 31 publish a delivery area, and 32 publish a founding year.

Seven metros is the widest this page could honestly reach, and it is wider than the three city pages that seeded it. Four of those seven arrived from companies listed under seafood or produce whose own copy names Asian ingredients, which is the inclusion rule working: what a company says it sells decides, not where it is or who runs it.

It is not a national sample and nothing here should be read as one. These are the Asian food suppliers we have verified from their own published sources in the metros we have researched.

1

Ask whether they import the line themselves

The answer changes whether a provenance question can be answered from their own paperwork or has to go back up the chain.

2

Read the country-of-origin marking on the case

It is there by law, in English, and if you are not transforming the article you are generally the purchaser it exists to inform.

3

Check whether your two suppliers share a parent

One in five rows on the city pages behind this one is a branch of a national company, and five companies account for all of them.

4

Expect the lead time on an imported line to be longer

Prior notice to FDA is required on every shipment before it lands. That is compliance work, not reluctance, and it is worth planning around rather than arguing about.

Unfiltered

What operators say about buying Asian food wholesale

20 comments quoted verbatim from public threads, gathered for this page from national trade forums rather than reused from a city page.

r/restaurantowners2 points
This, what is your state? here in SO CA, we use: Wismettac (formerly Nishimoto), JFC (japan food company) and Mutual trading, which has an extensive catalog of products design for japanese restaurants. This are all wholesalers, but their drink and snacks are limited. On the other hand they cover all for japanese restaurant food supplies except fresh.
Read the original comment
r/restaurantowners1 points
Go to the best sushi restaurants in the area and ask them who their vendors are. Avoid national chains (Sysco, RD, etc.). They don't specialize in fish. I own a sushi restaurant and we have one primary fish vendor but for a few things we have a couple of smaller vendors that fill in gaps or that our sushi chef feels has better quality or prices.
Read the original comment
r/AskCulinary2 points
it will be a tough battle for you since you have no restaurant experience, and from the sound of it, you haven't even work in one either, but if you are determined and have the cash to burn, go give it a couple years try. and suggestion to find purveyor, you can always try and go to local asian / korean markets and build a good relationship with the owners and then ask them where they get their meats / whole cuts / whole animal. also, please start learning korean
Read the original comment
r/KitchenConfidential4 points
Generally you call your rep and order over the phone, call the order desk and prey they send the right stuff, or anything at all. order it online from there order system or maybe you can text what you need. If you can order things with a product code instead of a description of what is needed you have a better chance of getting what you actually want instead of what they think you want or what they figure will be best.
Read the original comment
r/KitchenConfidential2 points
Yes. I can order throughout the day on my phone. I haven't placed an order in person for over 10 years. This doesn't mean I don't have communication for let's say, I want a certain oyster and I need to set that up w/ the rep for delivery. As a Chef, you need to almost train your reps to understand how you order, and they need to adjust. It's the 1 time where we get to be the customer. I do everything to make my customers happy, the reps better do the same
Read the original comment
r/KitchenConfidential1 points
Online ordering is great. Contact your rep and they can probably help you with everything. If you don't know the rep you probably should grab an old invoice before you call the company. That will have the account number and probably even a phone number too.
Read the original comment

Pulled from 462 threads and 5,598 comments across 125 subreddits, collected in September 2026 and quoted unedited. This is the thinnest buyer voice of the wave and the corpus is deliberately short rather than padded: about 940 comments from trade subreddits never mention an Asian ingredient, supplier or cuisine at all, and filling the set out with generic foodservice comments would have made it indistinguishable from every other page here. Its own corpus: no comment here appears on any other page of this site. Comments are unedited and link back to the original thread. They are individual experiences, not evidence about any distributor in general, and we deliberately do not aggregate them into a score.

Running a Asian food distribution business?

Phone calls, voicemails, emails with attachments, then hand-keying it all into a system. VoiceOrder Solutions gives food distributors a voice and web front door on the process they already run, so orders arrive digitized and reps get back to selling.

Talk to VoiceOrder Solutions

Questions

Asian food distributors: common questions

Do Asian food distributors import directly?

More often than distributors in any other category on this site. FDA publishes a quarterly list of importers subject to the Foreign Supplier Verification Programs rule, and 33 of the 56 suppliers on this page appear on it for April to June 2026, against 18.8 percent across all 789 listings here and 6.7 percent on the coffee pages. The match is by legal name and state, so a corporate group filing in one state understates itself, which makes that figure a floor rather than an exact count.

What is the FSVP importer list?

A list FDA publishes under section 805(g) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, naming importers subject to the Foreign Supplier Verification Programs regulation, with their names and states only, updated quarterly. FDA states two things about it that matter: inclusion conveys no approval or endorsement, and the entities on it may not be the importers of record for customs purposes. It also names no commodity, so being on it means a company imported some food in that quarter.

Is there a public list of every food warehouse?

No. Every facility holding food for US consumption must register with FDA, but that registration is not disclosable: FDA's own guidance says plainly that food facility registration information is not public. Two other identifiers are public in different ways: the FSVP importer list described above, and the FDA establishment identification number, which has its own search portal. So a buyer can look up who imported food last quarter and cannot look up who holds a warehouse registration.

Does imported food have to say where it came from?

The goods do. Customs and Border Protection requires that every article of foreign origin entering the United States be legibly marked with the English name of the country of origin, unless the law provides an exception. CBP defines the ultimate purchaser as generally the last person in the United States to receive the article in the form it was imported, which for a case of ingredients bought by a kitchen is usually the kitchen. There is no matching obligation to repeat it on a menu.

Why do imported lines have longer lead times?

Because every imported food shipment requires prior notice to FDA before it arrives, on top of customs clearance and the transit itself. That is routine compliance work a distributor does on every container and a domestic supplier never does, and it is generally what a longer quoted lead time on an imported line is pricing in.

Who is the largest Asian food distributor in the US?

Nobody can answer that from published information, which is itself the finding. Four companies describe themselves as the leading or number one Asian food distributor in the country, three of them without qualification. Only one publishes an audited figure, in its SEC filings: net revenue of $1,201.7 million for 2024, with a net loss of $48.1 million. Everything else available is a paywalled market-research estimate, so this page reports what each company says about itself and ranks none of them.

Does this page cover Asian grocery wholesalers?

No, and the distinction is real rather than pedantic. This trade splits by who it sells to: some companies supply kitchens and some supply supermarkets and corner stores, and they say so in their own words. This page covers the foodservice half. A few companies do both, and their listings say that. If you are stocking a store rather than a kitchen, the retail importers are a different set of businesses and are not listed here.

How wide is the term Asian food distributor?

Wider than the name suggests, and the best evidence for that comes from a third party rather than from us. The largest broadline distributor in the country runs a division under this name and describes its own trajectory as having expanded "from our early years serving primarily Chinese restaurants" to include "Thai, Vietnamese, Korean, Japanese, Indian, Middle Eastern, Mediterranean, and African customers". The companies listed here differ sharply in which pantry they are built around, and each row's full listing says which.